Posts Tagged ‘arizona’

Question: Just got summons in Arizona for a piece of property that was foreclosed on and sold. The bank is suing us for the deficiency amount. Is there any way to fight this? We think we may have a defense because there was no public report for this property at time of sale.

Answer: – Yes, the bank does have the right to go after the homeowner for the deficient amount after the home has been through foreclosure.

Question: I had an investment property go into foreclosure 9/1/09 in Arizona, Maricopa county. The home has a first mortgage for 160k and purchase money HELOC for 20K. Neither loan was ever touched after the purchase. On Aug 17, 2009 Countrywide sent me a letter informing me the HELOC will have a new servicer Real Time Resolutions, INC.
On 9/5/09, I received what seems to be an attempt to collect from Real Time Resolutions, INC. it states I have, “30 days to dispute the validity of this debt or any portion thereof, this office will assume this debt is valid.” The payoff they are requesting is $ 21,193.74 which I am assuming is the HELOC plus fees.

Is this allowed or legal, can a new servicer attempt to collect on the Heloc since the home has already gone into foreclosure? Should I meet with a lawyer or am I okay ignoring these letters?

Please advise and thanks for your time,

Aaliyah, Gilroy CA

Answer: -This is normal protical and yes since your loan was “sold” to a new servicer, they can try to collect the debt.  So they will send you certified letters in the mail every month telling you how much you owe and that it’s an attemt to collect the debt.  You don’t need to respond unless you are disputing the action and I’m sure they will try to call you every week and threaten you to pay…or else.  By sending these letters, it gives them the right to proceed with foreclosure if they want.  However, we all know they won’t unless there is substancial equity in the property.  More than likely they will just write it off as a loss and 1099 you for the difference.

Question: I have a home in Arizona [anti-deficiency state] that was purchased with an 80/20 loan. I have never refinanced the loans. We were in the process of negotiating a short sale, got approval from the first [with Country Wide] and they agreed to pay the 2nd [Citi] $3k, when we went back to Citi to get final approval we discovered that they charged off the 2nd and sold the loan to a subsidiary which has now turned it over to an attorney that claims they are going to file a deficiency judgement against me and collect the debt. They claim that since it was a second mortgage and it was charged off that they can do this. It was a second but it was a “purchase money” loan. Can they come after me for the deficiency?